New Yorker :)

here’s the review by Maya Jasanoff — and a delight to see the book among favorites:

Dec. 2022, William Pietz's The Problem of the Fetish is out

https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/P/bo180517990.html

William Pietz

Edited by Francesco Pellizzi, Stefanos Geroulanos, and Ben Kafka

A groundbreaking account of the origins and history of the idea of fetishism.
 
In recent decades, William Pietz’s innovative history of the idea of the fetish has become a cult classic. Gathered here, for the first time, is his complete series of essays on fetishism, supplemented by three texts on Marx, blood sacrifice, and the money value of human life. Tracing the idea of the fetish from its origins in the Portuguese colonization of West Africa to its place in Enlightenment thought and beyond, Pietz reveals the violent emergence of a foundational concept for modern theories of value, belief, desire, and difference. This book cements Pietz’s legacy of engaging questions about material culture, object agency, merchant capitalism, and spiritual power, and introduces a powerful theorist to a new generation of thinkers.

“Pietz’s dazzling investigation of the fetish as an enigma of power—a material artifact and a source of spiritual authority at once—binds together colonial history, merchant capital, anthropological inquiry, and group psychology. His prescient framing of the concept as establishing social value and debt is indispensable reading in our era of disaster capitalism and commodity terrorism.” -- David L. Eng, University of Pennsylvania

“Assembling Pietz’s early programmatic texts and later, lesser-known ones, this book discloses the momentum and trajectory of a body of work that changed how we think about the fetish concept and so much more. As the excellent introductory essays make clear, this influence is at once profound and enigmatic, a function of the elusive phenomenon called ‘fetishism’ and of Pietz’s rigorous thinking. The book is a gift—mandatory reading for every critical thinker of the contemporary and its histories.” -- Rosalind C. Morris, Columbia University

“In this groundbreaking work of interdisciplinary scholarship, Pietz provides an illuminating genealogy of fetishism, one that is also a fascinating theory of persistent misrecognition—of others and ourselves. Here, at last, the celebrated deployments of the fetish by Hume, Kant, Hegel, Marx, and Freud are put into philosophical and historical context. Fetishism was an essential ideologeme in the European colonializing of the world; this book is an essential tool in its conceptual decolonizing.” -- Hal Foster, Princeton University

"Fascisms and their Afterli(v)es," with Dagmar Herzog, Journal of the History of Ideas 82.1

Cybernetics and the Human Sciences

Cybernetics saturates the humanities. So Leif Weatherby and I guest-edited 'Cybernetics and the Human Sciences', the new issue of 'History of the Human Sciences' -- with some amazing essays— by Henning Schmidgen on Wiener, synchronization and neuroscience; David W. Bates versus Nicolas Guilhot on cybernetics and politics (David and Nicolas disagreed completely!); Danielle Carr on Arendt, behaviorism, and 'cognitive liberalism'; Diana Kurkovsky on the Soviet planning; Bernard Geoghegan and Jacob Krell on (different) moments of cybernetic influence in French thought, Christina Vagt on aesthetics and design, and Ron Kline on disunity and the second wave.

Here’s the link for the articles

And here’s our introduction!

Screen Shot 2020-05-14 at 1.39.50 AM.png

Syndicate Network: Discussion of 'Transparency in Postwar France'

Over at syndicate, and thanks above all to the curatorial and editorial work of Giovanni Menegalle and Danilo Scholz there’s a series of very generous review-essays by Sandrine Baume, Clare Birchall, Mayanthi Fernando, Nicholas Heron, and Laurent Jeanpierre, with comments by me) on each. I was humbled by their engagement and thoroughly enjoyed writing these responses.

https://syndicate.network/symposia/literature/transparency-in-postwar-france/

recent reviews

There have been a number of wonderful recent reviews and opportunities to engage with colleagues and critics of the Transparency in Postwar France and The Human Body in the Age of Catastrophe books, and I thought I’d compile these, just as the press is doing for their website.

 

The Human Body in the Age of Catastrophe

·       Isis 110:2 (June 2019— Rob Boddice), 435-36 — “a tour de force.”

·       Nuncius 34:2 (2019—Elisabetta Basso), 478–480— “fascinating and extremely rich… each chapter represents an autonomous and full-fledged study.”

·       Bulletin of the History of Medicine 93:2 (2019—Peter Leese), 282-283

·       “The Human Body on the Verge of Collapse,” Somatosphere (Ketil Slagstad), here.

·       Choice 56.6 (Feb. 2019) p.774—‘Recommended.’

·       Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 74: 4 (2019 –Lan A. Li), here.

·       H-Soz-u-Kult (16.4.2019, Bettina Zangerl), here.

·       “How Did Humanism Die? How did it Survive?,” Public Books (3/4/2019—Christopher Nealon), here.

·       Times Higher Education (January 31, 2019)—"Book of the Week.”

Still forthcoming (to my knowledge):

·       History of the Human Sciences—5 review essays, by Nima Bassiri, Stephen Casper, Katja Guenther, Eglė Rindzevičiūtė, and Anna Katharina Schaffner, with a response.

 

Transparency in Postwar France

·       “The Concept of Transparency, its History, and the Theory of Begriffsgeschichte,” History and Theory 58, no. 3 (September 2019—Andrew Dunstall), 460-470 — “masterful… a full-blown piece of critical theory”

·       H-Diplo Roundtable Review XX no. 37 (May 10, 2019— review essays by Carolyn Dean, Edward Baring, Stephen Sawyer, Iain Stewart, and a response), here.

·       Contemporary European History X (2018—Ana I. Keilson), 1-10.

·       American Historical Review (June 2019—Sarah Shurts), 1156-57.

·       Journal of Modern History (June 2019—Michael Behrent), 457-60, with useful critical points; I responded to this critique when Michael delivered it at FHS here.

Still forthcoming (to my knowledge):

·       Syndicate Forum (forthcoming, fall 2019). 5 review essays, by Sandrine Baume, Claire Birchall, Mayanthi Fernando, Nicholas Heron, Laurent Jeanpierre

Berkeley Center for New Media Lecture

Video of a recent talk at Berkeley, on “The Human Computer in the Stone Age.” This is from the histories of prehistory project—on weapons and tools and how, according to thinkers from the mid-century, they determined the human. It’s a bit tough as a video as this time i delivered a written paper; but the images and some moments are fun so I’m reposting it here. Huge thanks to David Bates, first of all, for the invitation, and also Abigail De Kosnik, Nicolas de Monchaux, Nasser Zakariya and Stefan-Ludwig Hoffmann and at BCNM Laurie Macfee , Lara Wolfe, Tara Shi, and their colleagues.

Berkeley Center for New Media's History and Theory of New Media Lecture Series.